|
THE BLUE SHEET
Products/Aerodynamic Design Defect – festive missile took
off at
eye level after lighting – loss of left eye – settled for
$2,100,000 and missile taken off the market, Bexar County
STYLE:
Teresa D. Hinojosa v.
Alamo Fireworks, Inc., et al
No. 96-CI-12941
PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY:
Daniel J.T. Sciano of Tinsman & Houser, Inc., San
Antonio
DEFENSE ATTORNEYS:
Eric Scott Levy of Gardere & Wynne, Dallas (Phoenix & O.K.
Fireworks)
Mark Brewster of Sparr & Associates, San Antonio (Pyro-Tech
& Atlas)
Gregg William Knaupe of Lea & Chamberlain (Po Sign)
Robin Baird of Cherry, Davis, Harrison, Williams & Baird,
Waco (U.S.)
TYPE OF CLAIM:
Product Liability/Aerodynamic Design
Defect/Negligence/Gross Negligence/Bystander
On
12-31-95, while celebrating the coming of the New Year,
Teresa Hinojosa, 32, placed a Phoenix Flyer with star
missile on plywood and made sure the missile was stable,
per the instructions. As she walked a few feet away, she
turned to look at the missile. The missile had elevated
about five feet, turned, and went straight toward her face
at extreme speed striking her in the left eye.
Plaintiff alleged Defendant manufacturer, Phoenix
Fireworks and O.K. Fireworks Corporation, were negligent
in the design of the rocket; that it had insufficient
initial thrust and that is why it traveled with erratic
trajectory and in a hazardous manner ultimately hitting
the Plaintiff in the left eye. Plaintiff claimed the
rocket had no stabilization system and should have been
designed and manufactured with a launch rod.
Additionally, Plaintiff obtained evidence that the missile
had failed CPSC requirements because of a long burn time.
The other Defendants were sued because they all were
involved in the stream of commerce (Po Sing was the motor
manufacturer).
Plaintiff obtained American Fireworks Standards Laboratory
(AFSL) testing done two years before, the results of which
indicated the Phoenix Flyer with star failed the AFSL
requirements because of trajectory problems. That same
report dated 03-29-93 read, “As they are now, these items
are pretty scary because too many of them take off at eye
level and are much too fast to avoid at any reasonable
distance.”
The
Defendants claimed there was nothing inherently dangerous
in the design of the rocket and insisted that by nature,
fireworks are a potential hazard insisting that people are
aware of the potential for danger and assume a portion of
the risk. Pyro-Tech, the assembler of the product,
claimed when it tested the missile, no problems were
revealed.
DAMAGES:
Plaintiff had seven surgeries in attempts to
save her left eye, but to no avail. She claimed past and
future pain and suffering, mental anguish, and
disfigurement.
EXPERTS:
Plaintiffs Mark Grubelich of Sandia Lab,
rocket science, Albuquerque, NM, re rocket
Thomas Priddy, Ph.D., Professor at UT,
formerly with Sandia Laboratory, rocket science, Austin,
re trajectory
Clayton Schneider, consumer fireworks manufacturing, New
York, NY
Arthur Fisk, Ph.D., specialist in human factors and
warnings, Atlanta, GA
Defendants Unknown
VERDICT:
Case settled for
$2,100,000. As part of the settlement conditions, the
parties agreed that the product would be forever removed
from the marketplace. All retailers, manufacturers, and
distributing stands were notified of a recall on all
Phoenix Flyer with star missiles.
An Agreed
Final Take Nothing Judgment was entered April 9, 1999.
SIDELIGHTS:
Pyro-Tech was not insured for the year this accident
happened. Phoenix and O.K. Fireworks agreed to indemnify
Pyro-Tech so long as Pyro-Tech had no independent
negligence that was the cause of the occurrence.
This case
was investigated and filed prior to a similar case in
Tarrant County.
In late
1998, the product was recalled from the marketplace.
A case
which closely resembles the fact scenario in this case was
settled for $2,250,000 in Tarrant County. Report in The
Blue Sheet of Northeast Texas, Volume III, Issue 10, page
20, dtd 5-17-99.
|